Crosswalks
Regulator matrix
Six major medical device regulators compared on nine topics. Each cell is a short summary; follow the linked terms for the full definition and primary sources. Always confirm details against the regulator's current text.
| Topic | United States FDA (CDRH) | European Union | United Kingdom MHRA | Canada | Japan | Australia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core law | Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; device rules in 21 CFR Parts 800 to 1299. | Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR), applying since May 26, 2021. | Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/618), as amended for Great Britain. | Medical Devices Regulations (SOR/98-282) under the Food and Drugs Act. | Act on Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices (PMD Act). | Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 and Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002. |
| Risk classes | Class I, II, III. | Class I (including Is, Im, Ir), IIa, IIb, III under Annex VIII rules. | Class I, IIa, IIb, III. | Class I, II, III, IV. | Class I, II, III, IV. | Class I (including Is, Im), IIa, IIb, III, plus active implantables. |
| Route to market | Exemption, 510(k), De Novo or PMA depending on class and predicate. | Conformity assessment, with a notified body for most classes above I, then CE marking. | UKCA marking through a UK approved body; CE marking accepted in Great Britain under transitional arrangements. | Medical Device Licence for Class II to IV; Class I sold under an establishment licence. | Notification (Class I), third-party certification (many Class II), or MHLW approval after PMDA review (higher risk). | Inclusion in the ARTG by an Australian sponsor, often using comparable overseas approvals. |
| Quality system | QMSR (21 CFR Part 820), incorporating ISO 13485:2016, effective February 2, 2026. | QMS required by MDR Article 10, usually shown through EN ISO 13485. | ISO 13485 based QMS assessed by the approved body. | ISO 13485 certificate issued under MDSAP for Class II to IV. | MHLW QMS Ministerial Ordinance, aligned with ISO 13485; MDSAP reports accepted. | ISO 13485 based QMS; MDSAP audit reports used as evidence. |
| Technical file and clinical evidence | Submission content set by pathway; significant risk studies need an IDE. | Technical documentation (Annexes II and III) and clinical evaluation with PMCF. | Technical documentation and clinical evaluation reviewed by the approved body. | Licence application with safety and effectiveness evidence scaled to class. | Application dossier (STED format) with clinical data where required. | Essential Principles checklist and clinical evidence held by the sponsor. |
| Post-market and vigilance | Medical Device Reporting (21 CFR Part 803), corrections and removals, recalls. | PMS system, vigilance (Articles 87 to 92), PSUR, FSCA reporting. | Incident reporting to MHRA; strengthened PMS requirements in force from June 16, 2025. | Mandatory problem reporting and recall reporting under the Regulations. | Adverse event and malfunction reporting to PMDA under the PMD Act. | Adverse event reporting by the sponsor to the TGA. |
| Device identification | UDI on labels and data in GUDID (21 CFR Part 830). | UDI system with registration in EUDAMED. | Device registration with MHRA; UDI requirements being introduced. | UDI framework under development. | Barcode labelling based on GS1 standards. | UDI framework and database being introduced. |
| Cybersecurity | Section 524B of the FD&C Act for cyber devices, including an SBOM, since March 29, 2023. | Annex I requirements for software and IT security, interpreted through MDCG 2019-16. | Assessed against essential requirements; follows international guidance. | Health Canada premarket cybersecurity guidance. | Cybersecurity expectations aligned with IMDRF guidance. | TGA cybersecurity guidance tied to the Essential Principles. |
| Local representative | US agent required for foreign establishments. | EU authorised representative for non-EU makers, plus a PRRC. | UK Responsible Person for makers outside the UK. | No formal representative; importers and distributors need establishment licences. | Marketing authorisation holder in Japan; foreign makers designate one. | Australian sponsor holds the ARTG entry. |
Other regulators
Want more depth on two of these? See US FDA vs EU MDR.