Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance
Named individual required by EU MDR/IVDR Article 15 with regulatory responsibility inside the manufacturer.
Definition
PRRCs must possess defined qualifications and experience and are personally responsible for conformity checks, technical documentation maintenance, post-market surveillance, vigilance, and clinical investigation reporting. Under MDR and IVDR Article 15, the PRRC must have documented expertise, through a relevant degree plus at least one year of regulatory or quality experience, or four years of experience. They are responsible for checking conformity before release, technical documentation, post-market surveillance, vigilance reporting and investigational device statements. Micro and small enterprises may use an external PRRC who is permanently available.What this means in practice
Small manufacturers can engage an external PRRC; importers and authorized representatives also have PRRC obligations under specific conditions.Examples
- A medical device manufacturer appoints an internal employee with a master’s degree in biomedical engineering and two years of experience in quality assurance as their PRRC, documenting their qualifications and responsibilities in the quality management system.
- A small start-up company developing an innovative diagnostic software engages an external consulting firm to provide PRRC services, ensuring that the consultant meets the experience and qualification criteria outlined in EU MDR Article 15.
- During an audit, an notified body reviews the PRRC’s job description, curriculum vitae, and evidence of continuous professional development to verify compliance with regulatory requirements.
- •A common pitfall is misunderstanding that the PRRC’s personal liability extends to criminal charges in certain jurisdictions for non-compliance.
- •Companies often fail to adequately define the PRRC’s direct access to management and resources, hindering their effectiveness.
- •Organizations may mistakenly believe that appointing an external PRRC absolves them of their own regulatory compliance responsibilities.
- •Inadequate documentation of the PRRC’s qualifications and experience can lead to non-conformities during audits.
- •Manufacturers sometimes neglect to update the PRRC’s responsibilities and training as regulations evolve or product portfolios change, leading to compliance gaps.
Frequently asked questions
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsMore in Regulatory
· Same categoryFDA submission demonstrating a device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate.
Two alternative disclosure mechanisms in a 510(k) submission, a Summary is public on FDA's website; a Statement promises to share Safety & Effectiveness info on request.
Formal mechanism to ask FDA whether a product is a device and, if so, its likely classification.
510(k) variant that relies on FDA guidance, special controls, or recognized consensus standards.
Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.
Latest in MedTech
Sources
3 sourcesEvery citation below opens the original document. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.
- 1MDCG 2019-7 PRRCTier 2 VerifiedMDCGhealth.ec.europa.eu
- 2RAPS Regulatory FocusTier 4 VerifiedRAPSraps.org
- 3FDA - Medical DevicesTier 2 VerifiedFDAfda.gov
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.