All terms

    Health Economics and Outcomes Research

    Research discipline that generates economic, clinical, and patient-reported evidence to support payer access, HTA submissions, and value demonstration.

    Reviewed by Christian Espinosa, Founder, Blue Goat CyberLast reviewed May 9, 2026

    Definition

    Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) is the multidisciplinary field that generates economic models (cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, budget impact), real-world evidence, and patient-reported outcomes data used by payers, HTA bodies, and health systems to assess a technology's value. HEOR deliverables include the Global Value Dossier, AMCP Format submissions to US health plans, and country-specific HTA submissions (NICE, CADTH, IQWiG, HAS).
    What the regulation says
    Methodology references: ISPOR Good Practices, AMCP Format for Formulary Submissions v4.1, NICE Reference Case, ICER Value Assessment Framework. CMS's TCET program explicitly requires evidence aligned with HEOR principles.

    What this means in practice

    Strong HEOR is the difference between coverage and non-coverage in single-payer systems and is rising in importance for US commercial payers. Increasingly, HEOR planning starts at preclinical/early clinical to ensure trial endpoints support the value story.

    Examples

    • A MedTech company developed a novel diagnostic device and used HEOR to demonstrate its cost-effectiveness compared to existing methods, helping secure a positive reimbursement decision from a national health technology assessment body.
    • Prior to launching a new surgical implant, the manufacturer conducted HEOR studies to generate real-world evidence on patient-reported outcomes and long-term cost savings, which were then included in their AMCP dossier for US commercial payers.
    • Early HEOR planning for a therapeutic device led to the inclusion of specific quality of life endpoints in clinical trials, ensuring the generated data would support the value proposition for future payer negotiations.
    Common pitfalls
    • •Designing pivotal trials around regulatory endpoints only and finding the dataset can't support the HEOR case.
    • •Treating HEOR as a post-launch activity instead of an evidence-generation strategy from Phase 1.

    Frequently asked questions

    HEOR generates economic models such as cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses, real-world evidence, and patient-reported outcomes data intended to answer payer and health technology assessment questions about value, whereas FDA submissions focus on demonstrating safety and effectiveness against a regulatory standard. A pivotal trial can satisfy FDA's evidentiary bar while still lacking the endpoints, comparator arms, or follow-up duration that a payer's HEOR-based coverage decision requires.
    Grouped by theme
    Cited by

    Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.

    Latest in MedTech

    Sources

    3 sources

    Sources support the definition or relevant regulatory context, not necessarily every claim on this page. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.

    Official citation replacements checked: . Medicare documents support Medicare coding, coverage or payment context, not every payer policy or CPT editorial procedure. Citation replacement does not change the full term review date.

    Tier 3Peer-reviewed and registry evidence· 3
    Link health: 3 verified· last checked 2026-06-20· added official documents checked 2026-11-01
    ISPOR·1AMCP·1NICE·1
    1. 1
      ISPOR, Good Practices
      Tier 3 Verified
      ISPORispor.org
    2. 2
      AMCP Format for Formulary Submissions
      Tier 3 Verified
      AMCPamcp.org
    3. 3
      NICE health technology evaluation manual: economic evaluation
      Tier 3 Verified
      NICEnice.org.uk

    Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.