MedTech Terms
    The authoritative reference
    All terms
    Market SegmentsStrategic LandscapeIVD

    In Vitro Diagnostics

    Tests performed on biological samples outside the body.

    Reviewed by Christian Espinosa, Founder, Blue Goat CyberLast reviewed May 5, 2026

    Definition

    IVDs include immunoassays, molecular diagnostics (PCR, NGS), clinical chemistry, hematology, microbiology, and point-of-care tests. Regulated by FDA's CDRH (CBER for some) and under the EU IVDR in Europe.
    What the regulation says
    In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Devices are regulated based on their intended use and risk classification. In the United States, the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) regulates most IVDs, while the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) regulates certain IVDs, such as those used for blood screening. The EU In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR 2017/746) provides the regulatory framework in Europe, classifying IVDs into classes A, B, C, and D based on their risk to public health and individual patients, with Class D representing the highest risk.

    What this means in practice

    Roche Diagnostics, Abbott, Siemens Healthineers, Danaher (Beckman, Cepheid), and Thermo Fisher dominate. Companion diagnostics and oncology MRD are key growth areas. EU IVDR transition has been disruptive.

    Examples

    • A blood glucose monitoring system, used by diabetics at home, is an IVD that typically falls under a lower risk class due to its intended use for individual monitoring.
    • A test kit used to detect HIV antibodies in blood samples is a high-risk IVD, classified as Class D under the EU IVDR, requiring rigorous conformity assessment procedures.
    • Software that analyzes genetic sequences to predict an individual's predisposition to certain diseases is an IVD and must comply with regulations for medical device software.
    Common pitfalls
    • A common pitfall is misunderstanding the classification rules for IVDs, which can lead to incorrect conformity assessment routes and delays in market access.
    • Failing to adequately validate software used in IVDs can result in regulatory non-compliance, as software is considered a medical device or an accessory to one.
    • Ignoring post-market surveillance requirements for IVDs can lead to significant regulatory issues, especially under the EU IVDR's emphasis on lifelong monitoring.
    • Confusion surrounding companion diagnostics, specifically their dual regulation as both pharmaceuticals and medical devices, can lead to compliance gaps.

    Frequently asked questions

    The EU IVDR (2017/746) replaced the EU IVDD (98/79/EC) to enhance patient safety and product quality. Key changes include a new risk-based classification system, stricter clinical evidence requirements, and increased post-market surveillance obligations.
    Grouped by theme

    Mentioned in recent activity

    1 entry

    Latest in MedTech

    View all

    Recent regulatory actions, publications, and trials matched to this term. Updated daily.

    Primary references

    3 sources
    Link health: 3 verified· last checked 2026-06-20
    AdvaMedDx·1MedTech Dive·1AdvaMed·1
    1. 1
      AdvaMedDx
      Verified
      AdvaMedDxadvameddx.org
    2. 2
      MedTech Dive
      Verified
      MedTech Divemedtechdive.com
    3. 3
      AdvaMed - Industry Reports
      Verified
      AdvaMedadvamed.org

    Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.