Indications for Use
Description of the disease or condition the device will diagnose, treat, prevent, cure, or mitigate.
Definition
The Indications for Use statement is a specific statement of disease, condition, or anatomical site for which a device is intended, including the patient population. It is a formal part of a 510(k), De Novo or PMA, usually submitted on FDA Form 3881, and appears in the clearance or approval decision. Indications that differ from the predicate's may still allow substantial equivalence if the intended use is the same, but broader or new indications often raise new questions of safety and effectiveness.What this means in practice
Indications for Use is a specific, regulatorily significant subset of intended use, captured in 510(k) and PMA decision summaries.Examples
- A continuous glucose monitor's Indications for Use state: "For use by people age 18 years and older with diabetes mellitus for the management of their diabetes through the measurement of glucose levels in interstitial fluid."
- A surgical robot's Indications for Use specifies: "Intended for use in general laparoscopic surgical procedures to assist in the precise manipulation of instruments and visualization of the surgical field."
- An in vitro diagnostic test's Indications for Use might declare: "For the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antigen from nasal swab specimens collected from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider within the first seven days of symptom onset."
- •Confusing "Indications for Use" with "intended use" can lead to mislabeling and regulatory non-compliance.
- •Failing to precisely define the patient population or conditions can result in a device being used off-label, creating safety risks.
- •Inconsistent Indications for Use across different official documents, such as regulatory submissions and marketing materials, can trigger regulatory scrutiny.
- •Not clearly delineating the specific disease or condition the device addresses can lead to ambiguity in its application and efficacy claims.
- •Omitting contraindications or warnings within the labeling related to the Indications for Use can result in adverse events and regulatory actions.
Frequently asked questions
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsThe objective intent of the manufacturer regarding the use of the device.
FDA submission demonstrating a device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate.
FDA's most stringent device marketing application, required for high-risk Class III devices.
510(k) Fundamentals
· From this learning pathA legally marketed device used as the comparator in a 510(k) submission.
Pathway to classify novel low- to moderate-risk devices that lack a predicate.
The legal standard a 510(k) device must meet versus a predicate.
FDA administrative decision that a submission is incomplete and won't be substantively reviewed.
De Novo & Breakthrough Pathways
· From this learning pathFDA program providing expedited review for devices that treat life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating conditions.
Product comprised of two or more regulated components - e.g., drug-device, biologic-device.
Voluntary mechanism to obtain FDA feedback before a formal premarket submission.
Formal FDA feedback request prior to a marketing or IDE submission.
Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.
- 510(k) FundamentalsLesson 5 of 7
- De Novo & Breakthrough PathwaysLesson 6 of 11
Latest in MedTech
Sources
3 sourcesEvery citation below opens the original document. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.
- 1European Commission - Medical DevicesTier 2 VerifiedEuropean Commissionhealth.ec.europa.eu
- 2IMDRF DocumentsTier 2 VerifiedIMDRFimdrf.org
- 3RAPS Regulatory FocusTier 4 VerifiedRAPSraps.org
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.