Fault Tree Analysis
Top-down deductive analysis tracing how faults can combine to cause an undesired event.
Definition
FTA per IEC 61025 uses Boolean logic to model how component-level faults and external events combine to cause a defined top-level hazardous event, supporting both qualitative and quantitative analysis. FTA is a top-down method: it starts from an undesired event, such as overdose delivered, and works down through AND and OR gates to basic causes. It complements bottom-up FMEA by revealing combinations of faults and common-cause failures. In medical devices it is often used for high severity hazards and software-controlled safety functions, and quantitative FTA needs reliable failure rate data.What this means in practice
Often paired with FMEA: FTA reasons backward from a harm; FMEA reasons forward from components. FTA is favored for systems with safety-critical software and rare catastrophic failure modes.Examples
- A medical device manufacturer uses FTA to analyze how a combination of software bugs, sensor malfunctions, and user errors could lead to an incorrect drug dosage delivery by an infusion pump.
- A team developing an AI-powered diagnostic tool employs FTA to map out how various system component failures and data integrity issues could result in a misdiagnosis, identifying critical control points.
- A cybersecurity team utilizes FTA to determine the pathways by which a denial-of-service attack could successfully incapacitate a networked hospital imaging system, informing their mitigation strategies.
- •Failing to clearly define the top-level event can lead to a convoluted and ineffective fault tree.
- •Overlooking common cause failures or human error in the fault tree can significantly underestimate risk.
- •Treating FTA as a standalone activity rather than an iterative part of the product lifecycle reduces its effectiveness.
- •Applying FTA to systems without well-defined failure modes or clear causal relationships can yield misleading results.
- •Not adequately validating the fault tree against real-world data or expert opinion can compromise its accuracy and credibility.
Frequently asked questions
Cross-references
Used by
Often confused with
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsMore in Quality & Risk
· Same categoryAbility of a material to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application.
Verification step confirming a corrective or preventive action actually fixed the problem.
Formal QMS process for evaluating, approving, and implementing changes that could affect product quality or compliance.
Process for receiving, evaluating, and responding to device complaints.
Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.
Sources
3 sourcesSources support the definition or relevant regulatory context, not necessarily every claim on this page. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.
- 1IEC 61025Tier 1 VerifiedIECwebstore.iec.ch
- 2MDIC Case for QualityTier 4 VerifiedMDICmdic.org
- 3FDA - Quality SystemsTier 2 VerifiedFDAfda.gov
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.