Safer Technologies Program
FDA program for devices addressing less serious conditions but offering meaningful safety improvements.
Definition
STeP provides Breakthrough-style benefits - interactive review and prioritization - for devices reasonably expected to significantly improve the safety of currently available treatments or diagnostics for non-life-threatening conditions.What this means in practice
Often used for safer redesigns of existing devices (e.g., reducing infection risk, eliminating a hazardous material). Acceptance is selective.Examples
- A novel catheter designed with an antimicrobial coating to significantly reduce the risk of hospital-acquired infections in routine, non-life-threatening procedures could be a candidate for STeP.
- A redesigned infusion pump that incorporates advanced error-prevention technology to drastically lower medication administration errors for non-critical care patients might qualify for STeP.
- A new material used in a medical implant for a non-life-threatening condition that eliminates the risk of a known biocompatibility issue present in existing materials could be considered for STeP.
- •A common pitfall is misunderstanding that STeP focuses on safety improvements for non-life-threatening conditions, not efficacy for life-threatening ones. Another mistake is assuming all safety improvements qualify, as the program specifically targets "significant" safety improvements. Manufacturers sometimes fail to provide sufficient justification that their device offers a substantial safety improvement over existing technologies when applying for STeP designation.
- •Failing to engage with the FDA early and often, which is a key benefit of the STeP program, can hinder the expedited review process.
- •Misinterpreting "non-life-threatening conditions" can lead to inappropriate applications, as the program has specific criteria for this aspect.
Frequently asked questions
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsMore in Regulatory
· Same categoryFDA submission demonstrating a device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate.
Two alternative disclosure mechanisms in a 510(k) submission, a Summary is public on FDA's website; a Statement promises to share Safety & Effectiveness info on request.
Formal mechanism to ask FDA whether a product is a device and, if so, its likely classification.
510(k) variant that relies on FDA guidance, special controls, or recognized consensus standards.
Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.
Mentioned in recent activity
8 entriesLatest in MedTech
Recent regulatory actions, publications, and trials matched to this term. Updated daily.
-
PubMed2026-05-07A step-by-step guide for implementation of virtual surgical applications and patient data centralization: practical experience and lessons learned.
3D printing in medicine
-
Primary references
3 sources- 1
Safer Technologies Program (STeP)VerifiedFDAfda.gov
- 2
FDA - Medical DevicesVerifiedFDAfda.gov
- 3
European Commission - Medical DevicesVerifiedEuropean Commissionhealth.ec.europa.eu
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.