Special 510(k)
Streamlined 510(k) for modifications to a manufacturer's own legally marketed device.
Definition
A Special 510(k) relies on design control procedures to support a determination of substantial equivalence for changes to the submitter's own predicate, with a target FDA review goal of 30 days.What this means in practice
Best when the modification's effects can be assessed via verification and validation methods with well-established performance criteria. Not appropriate for changes to indications for use.Examples
- A manufacturer updates the software of a cleared infusion pump to improve the user interface without changing the essential performance or safety algorithms, submitting a Special 510(k) supported by software verification and validation documentation.
- A company modifies the material of a component in a cleared surgical instrument to enhance durability, demonstrating equivalence through material testing and biocompatibility data via a Special 510(k).
- A MedTech firm makes a minor dimensional change to a cleared orthopedic implant that does not affect its fit or function, submitting a Special 510(k) with engineering analyses and test results.
- •A common pitfall is submitting a Special 510(k) for changes that significantly alter the device's technology or intended use, leading to a rejection or a request for a Traditional 510(k).
- •Misjudging the appropriate level of verification and validation needed for the modification can result in an incomplete submission.
- •Failing to clearly document the link between the design changes and the supporting verification and validation activities is a frequent mistake.
- •Assuming a 30-day review timeline is guaranteed, as the actual review time can be longer if deficiencies are identified.
- •Submitting a Special 510(k) for modifications that introduce new risks or significantly impact patient safety is inappropriate and will be rejected.
Frequently asked questions
Cross-references
Part of
A larger framework or document this term belongs to.
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsFDA submission demonstrating a device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate.
510(k) variant that relies on FDA guidance, special controls, or recognized consensus standards.
Structured process governing the design of medical devices.
More in Regulatory
· Same categoryTwo alternative disclosure mechanisms in a 510(k) submission, a Summary is public on FDA's website; a Statement promises to share Safety & Effectiveness info on request.
Formal mechanism to ask FDA whether a product is a device and, if so, its likely classification.
FDA voluntary program in which accredited testing labs perform standards-based testing accepted with reduced FDA scrutiny.
FDA's 2024 final rule creating a pathway for nonprescription drug products that rely on additional conditions (e.g., self-selection tools, drug-device combinations) to ensure safe use without a healthcare provider.
Primary references
3 sources- 1
The Special 510(k) ProgramVerifiedFDAfda.gov
- 2
RAPS Regulatory FocusVerifiedRAPSraps.org
- 3
FDA - Medical DevicesVerifiedFDAfda.gov
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.