Back to Reimbursement & Market Access

    Prior Authorization

    Payer requirement for approval before a service or device is covered.

    Reviewed by Christian Espinosa, Founder, Blue Goat CyberLast reviewed May 5, 2026

    Definition

    Prior authorization (PA) is a payer process requiring providers to obtain approval - based on medical necessity criteria - before a service, procedure, or device is covered. Common for high-cost devices, advanced imaging, and many DTx/RPM services. Payers use clinical criteria such as their own policies, InterQual or MCG guidelines, and decisions can be appealed. CMS's 2024 Interoperability and Prior Authorization rule requires Medicare Advantage, Medicaid and some other plans to speed decisions and add electronic prior authorization interfaces in stages starting in 2026. Device companies often fund patient access support teams to help with paperwork.
    What the regulation says
    CMS's Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule, CMS-0057-F (89 FR 8758, published February 8, 2024; effective April 8, 2024), establishes requirements for Medicare Advantage organizations, Medicaid and CHIP programs and managed care plans, and qualified health plan issuers on federally facilitated exchanges. Beginning January 1, 2026, affected payers, except those exchange issuers, must issue prior authorization decisions within 72 hours for expedited requests and seven calendar days for standard requests. Shorter applicable deadlines still control. The rule also requires affected payers to provide specific reasons for denials and publicly report prior authorization metrics, with these operational requirements beginning in 2026. Its prior authorization provisions exclude drugs. The rule generally requires implementation of a standards-based Prior Authorization API beginning January 1, 2027. This interface must help providers identify covered services requiring authorization, determine documentation requirements, and submit requests and receive responses electronically. These obligations modernize the process rather than establish uniform medical necessity criteria or guarantee coverage. For MedTech companies, FDA marketing authorization and payer authorization remain distinct: permission to market a device does not itself establish reimbursement. Patient access support should therefore follow the applicable payer's documentation, coverage, and appeal requirements.

    What this means in practice

    PA is a major friction point for new technology adoption; clinical pathway and PA support tools are increasingly part of the manufacturer commercial model.

    Examples

    • A patient requires a specialized implantable device for a complex cardiac condition. The cardiologist must submit a prior authorization request to the patient's health insurance, detailing medical necessity and expected benefits before the device can be approved for coverage and surgical implantation.
    • A physician prescribes a new digital therapeutic for chronic pain management. The clinic's billing department is responsible for obtaining prior authorization from the patient's payer, often involving submitting clinical documentation to demonstrate that the patient meets the payer's specific criteria for the therapy.
    • Prior to a patient undergoing an advanced diagnostic imaging procedure, such as a high-resolution MRI, the ordering physician's office must contact the insurance provider for prior authorization. This often requires providing clinical justification to ensure the procedure is deemed medically necessary according to the payer's guidelines.
    Common pitfalls
    • •Underestimating PA denial rates and appeal timelines when modeling commercial uptake.

    Frequently asked questions

    Payers use prior authorization as a utilization management tool specifically for services where cost, variability in appropriate use, or new-technology status create financial risk to the plan, which is why advanced imaging, high-cost implants, and many newer digital therapeutics or remote monitoring services are common PA targets while routine, low-cost, well-established procedures typically are not. As a device or service category matures with established clinical guidelines and predictable utilization patterns, payers sometimes relax PA requirements, but new MedTech categories should generally expect PA friction at launch.
    Grouped by theme
    Cited by

    Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.

    Learning paths (1)

    Latest in MedTech

    Sources

    3 sources

    Every citation below opens the original document. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.

    Tier 2Regulator guidance and consensus· 1Tier 4Trade press and expert commentary· 2
    Link health: 3 verified· last checked 2026-06-20
    CMS·1AMA·1AdvaMed·1
    1. 1
      CMS PA reform
      Tier 2 Verified
      CMScms.gov
    2. 2
      AMA CPT Resources
      Tier 4 Verified
      AMAama-assn.org
    3. 3
      AdvaMed - Payment & Coverage
      Tier 4 Verified
      AdvaMedadvamed.org

    Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.