New Technology Add-On Payment
Supplemental Medicare payment for inpatient use of qualifying new technologies.
Definition
NTAP provides up to 65% additional payment (75% for some categories) above the MS-DRG rate to hospitals using qualifying new technologies. Eligibility requires FDA marketing authorization, newness (typically <3 years), substantial clinical improvement, and inadequate MS-DRG payment. NTAP applications are due in the fall for the next fiscal year and are reviewed in the IPPS proposed and final rules. Breakthrough Devices and certain antimicrobial products follow an alternative pathway that does not require proving substantial clinical improvement. NTAP status generally lasts two to three years, after which the cost should be reflected in DRG data.What this means in practice
NTAP bridges the gap while CMS gathers utilization data to update DRG weights. Time-limited (2–3 years). Critical for high-cost devices used inpatient.Examples
- A medical device manufacturer secures NTAP for a novel cardiac assist device after demonstrating its FDA approval, significant improvement in heart failure patient outcomes, and that existing DRG payments do not cover its acquisition cost.
- A hospital successfully applies for NTAP for a new surgical robot that allows for less invasive procedures with shorter recovery times, meeting the newness and substantial clinical improvement criteria.
- A pharmaceutical company receives NTAP for a new antibiotic that treats highly resistant infections, as it has FDA approval and provides a unique treatment option where existing therapies are ineffective.
- •A common pitfall is failing to secure timely FDA marketing authorization, which is a prerequisite for NTAP consideration.
- •Misinterpreting the "newness" criterion can lead to missed application windows, as technologies typically qualify for a limited period, often three years.
- •Overlooking the requirement for "substantial clinical improvement" can result in rejection, as mere incremental advancements may not be sufficient.
- •Failing to demonstrate that the existing Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) payment is inadequate to cover the technology's costs is a frequent pitfall.
- •Companies sometimes assume NTAP is a permanent solution rather than a transitional payment mechanism while CMS updates DRG weights.
Frequently asked questions
Cross-references
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsMedicare's payment system for inpatient hospital stays.
Medicare's inpatient hospital payment classification system.
Supplemental outpatient payment for new device technologies.
Reimbursement & Market Access
· From this learning pathPrivate contractors that process Medicare Part A/B and DME claims and issue Local Coverage Determinations within their jurisdictions.
CMS pathway providing time-limited Medicare coverage for FDA-designated Breakthrough Devices.
Financial model that estimates the total cost consequences of adopting a new technology to a payer's budget over a defined horizon.
AMA-maintained codes that describe medical procedures and services.
More in Reimbursement
· Same categoryWhere this term appears across MedTech Terms.
- Reimbursement & Market AccessLesson 8 of 14
Latest in MedTech
Sources
3 sourcesEvery citation below opens the original document. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.
- 1CMS NTAPTier 2 VerifiedCMScms.gov
- 2AdvaMed - Payment & CoverageTier 4 VerifiedAdvaMedadvamed.org
- 3AMA CPT ResourcesTier 4 VerifiedAMAama-assn.org
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.