Management Representative
Member of management appointed to ensure QMS processes are established and report on QMS performance.
Definition
Required by ISO 13485 §5.5.2 and 21 CFR 820.20(b)(3), the management representative has explicit authority to ensure QMS effectiveness and to escalate issues to top management. Beyond escalation, the role reports on QMS performance and improvement needs and promotes awareness of regulatory and customer requirements. Under the QMSR it is carried through ISO 13485 clause 5.5.2 rather than the old 820.20(b)(3). It differs from the EU MDR's person responsible for regulatory compliance, though small companies sometimes give both roles to one person.What this means in practice
Often confused with the Quality VP - the role is about authority and reporting line, not title.Examples
- A MedTech company designates its VP of Regulatory Affairs as the Management Representative, explicitly outlining their authority in the quality manual to report QMS performance directly to the CEO.
- During an FDA inspection, the Management Representative presents objective evidence of management reviews, demonstrating effective oversight of the QMS as required by 21 CFR 820.20(b)(3).
- An organization updates its QMS procedures, and the Management Representative reviews these changes to ensure they align with ISO 13485:2016 requirements before implementation.
- •A common pitfall is conflating the Management Representative role with a specific job title, such as Quality VP, rather than focusing on the required authority and responsibilities.
- •Failing to grant the Management Representative sufficient independence or direct access to top management can undermine the effectiveness of the role and QMS oversight.
- •Inadequate documentation of the Management Representative's appointment, responsibilities, and authority can lead to non-conformities during audits.
- •Assuming the Management Representative is solely responsible for all quality matters, rather than promoting a company-wide culture of quality, is a common misconception.
Frequently asked questions
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsMore in Quality & Risk
· Same categoryAbility of a material to perform with an appropriate host response in a specific application.
Verification step confirming a corrective or preventive action actually fixed the problem.
Formal QMS process for evaluating, approving, and implementing changes that could affect product quality or compliance.
Process for receiving, evaluating, and responding to device complaints.
Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.
Latest in MedTech
Sources
3 sourcesSources support the definition or relevant regulatory context, not necessarily every claim on this page. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.
- 1ISO 13485:2016Tier 1 VerifiedISOiso.org
- 2MDIC Case for QualityTier 4 VerifiedMDICmdic.org
- 3FDA - Quality SystemsTier 2 VerifiedFDAfda.gov
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.