Limit of Detection / Limit of Quantitation
Lowest analyte concentrations an assay can reliably detect (LoD) or quantify (LoQ).
Definition
LoD is the lowest concentration distinguishable from a blank with stated probability. LoQ is the lowest concentration that can be quantitatively measured with stated accuracy and precision (per CLSI EP17 / EP05). CLSI EP17 describes how to establish the limit of blank, LoD and LoQ using replicate testing across lots, instruments and days. The LoQ is often set where total error or imprecision meets a predefined goal. These values appear in the IFU and in performance evaluation evidence under IVDR and in FDA submissions, and matter most for assays used near clinical decision thresholds.What this means in practice
Critical performance characteristics for IVD claims, especially for infectious disease and oncology assays where low-burden detection drives clinical utility.Examples
- An IVD manufacturer determines the LoD for its new HIV viral load assay to ensure it can detect very low levels of viral RNA in early infection, as required by FDA guidance.
- A molecular diagnostic company establishes the LoQ for its oncology assay to precisely measure circulating tumor DNA fragments, guiding treatment selection and monitoring in cancer patients.
- An assay for detecting bacterial pathogens in blood culture is validated with an LoD study to confirm its ability to identify low colony counts before clinical symptoms become severe.
- •Failing to establish LoD and LoQ using appropriate statistical methods can lead to invalid claims regarding assay sensitivity.
- •Not re-evaluating LoD and LoQ after significant assay modifications can result in underperforming or non-compliant devices.
- •Confusing LoD with clinical sensitivity can lead to misinterpretation of an assay's true diagnostic capability.
- •Using inappropriate sample matrices for LoD and LoQ studies can invalidate the relevance of the established limits to real-world clinical use.
- •Presenting a single LoD or LoQ value when different matrices or sample types require distinct limits is a common oversight.
Frequently asked questions
Cross-references
See also
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsMore in Clinical & Trials
· Same categoryTrial design that pre-specifies opportunities to modify aspects (sample size, arms, endpoints) based on interim data.
Any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, whether or not related to the device.
Data integrity principles: Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate (plus Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available).
Trial design that uses Bayesian statistics, often incorporating prior data from related studies or registries.
Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.
Latest in MedTech
Sources
3 sourcesSources support the definition or relevant regulatory context, not necessarily every claim on this page. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.
- 1CLSI EP17Tier 1 VerifiedCLSIclsi.org
- 2ISO 14155 Standard PageTier 1 VerifiedISOiso.org
- 3FDA - Clinical Trials and Human Subject ProtectionTier 2 VerifiedFDAfda.gov
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.