All terms

    Performance Study (IVDR)

    A study to establish or confirm analytical or clinical performance of an IVD, governed by IVDR Articles 57 to 77.

    Reviewed by Christian Espinosa, Founder, Blue Goat CyberLast reviewed July 25, 2026

    Definition

    Article 2(42) of the IVDR defines a performance study as a study undertaken to establish or confirm the analytical or clinical performance of a device. Articles 57 to 77 and Annex XIII Part A Section 2 set out study design, sponsor obligations, ethics review, informed consent, and adverse-event reporting, with additional obligations for interventional studies and studies involving companion diagnostics.
    What the regulation says
    Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR), adopted on 5 April 2017 and applicable from 26 May 2022, defines a performance study in Article 2(42) as a study undertaken to establish or confirm a device's analytical or clinical performance. Article 57 sets general requirements for scientific validity, ethical conduct and protection of subjects. Annex XIII, Part A, Section 2 addresses clinical performance studies, including their design, performance study plan and reporting. For MedTech sponsors, the applicable pathway depends on how specimens are collected, whether study results influence patient management and the risks to participants. Article 58 triggers additional requirements for studies involving surgically invasive sampling solely for the study, interventional clinical performance studies, or additional invasive procedures or other risks to subjects. These requirements cover ethics review, informed consent under Article 59, sponsor responsibilities and the application and authorisation procedures in Article 66. Article 76 governs recording and reporting of adverse events and relevant device deficiencies for studies within its scope. Under Article 58(2), companion diagnostic studies generally follow the same additional requirements, but studies using only leftover samples are exempt from that regime and must instead be notified to the competent authority.

    What this means in practice

    Performance studies are the IVDR analogue of MDR clinical investigations but with categories tied to invasiveness of sampling and use of results in patient management. Interventional studies (Article 58(2)) require prior authorisation by Member States, similar to MDR clinical investigations.

    Examples

    • A laboratory studies an IVD assay's precision and detection capability using stored specimens, without returning results for patient care. The sponsor assesses the applicable IVDR requirements rather than assuming an interventional study pathway applies.
    • A prospective study uses an investigational IVD result to determine whether participants receive a particular treatment. Because results influence patient management, the sponsor follows the interventional clinical performance study pathway, including prior authorisation.
    • A study evaluates whether a proposed companion diagnostic identifies patients with a tumour biomarker relevant to a corresponding medicine. Its plan addresses clinical performance endpoints and the IVDR requirements specific to companion diagnostic studies.
    Common pitfalls
    • •Assuming every performance study follows the same authorisation pathway. Requirements depend on features such as invasive sampling, additional procedures, and use of results in patient management.
    • •Treating analytical performance alone as proof of clinical performance. Demonstrating reliable measurement does not necessarily establish how results relate to a clinical condition in the intended population.
    • •Treating MDR clinical investigation requirements or FDA clinical trial information as substitutes for IVDR requirements. An IVD performance study needs an assessment against the applicable IVDR provisions.

    Frequently asked questions

    Both are pre-market human studies, but a performance study under Article 2(42) of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 is categorised by the invasiveness of sample collection and whether results are used in patient management, rather than by device implantability as under the MDR. Interventional performance studies under Article 58(2), where results influence treatment decisions, require prior Member State authorisation similar to MDR clinical investigations.
    Grouped by theme
    Cited by

    Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.

    Sources

    3 sources

    Every citation below opens the original document. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.

    Tier 1Binding law and standards· 2Tier 2Regulator guidance and consensus· 1
    Link health: 3 verified· last checked 2026-06-20
    EUR-Lex·1ISO·1FDA·1
    1. 1
      Regulation (EU) 2017/746, Articles 57 to 77
      Tier 1 Verified
      EUR-Lexeur-lex.europa.eu
    2. 2
      ISO 14155 Standard Page
      Tier 1 Verified
      ISOiso.org
    3. 3
      FDA - Clinical Trials and Human Subject Protection
      Tier 2 Verified
      FDAfda.gov

    Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.