Compare

    Two terms, side by side

    Pick any two terms to see definitions, context, pitfalls, and sources in parallel.

    Curated comparison tables

    In-depth, attribute-by-attribute tables for the most common MedTech term pairs. Each row is sourced from the linked term pages.

    Cybersecurity

    Penetration Testing

    In one line
    Hands-on adversarial testing in which qualified independent testers attempt to exploit a device's security controls.
    Definition
    Penetration testing (pen testing) is hands-on adversarial security testing in which qualified, sufficiently independent testers attempt to exploit a medical device's security controls - network services, web/API interfaces, wireless protocols, physical interfaces (USB, JTAG, UART), companion apps, and back-end cloud - to uncover weaknesses that automated scanners miss. A pen test produces an evidence package: methodology, findings (with reproduction steps), severity ratings, and remediation recommendations.
    Why it matters
    Pen testing is most valuable when scoped against a current threat model and run before V&V freeze so findings can be designed-out rather than risk-accepted. Mature MedTech teams budget for an annual external pen test plus targeted retests after major changes. Findings flow into CAPA and re-test verification.
    Common pitfalls
    • •Hiring a generic pen-test firm with no medical-device experience - they'll miss the device-specific attack surface.
    • •Scoping the test too narrowly (only the web UI) and missing the wireless, hardware, or backend channels.
    • •Treating the pen-test report as a one-time deliverable instead of feeding remediation into CAPA and re-test.
    Open full page
    Select term B to compare.

    Why compare MedTech terms side by side?

    MedTech terminology is full of pairs that look interchangeable but carry very different regulatory, clinical, and commercial consequences. Picking the wrong framework, pathway, or standard early in a project can add months to a submission, invalidate clinical evidence, or trigger an audit finding. Side-by-side comparison is the fastest way to surface those differences before they become costly mistakes.

    Each comparison on this page pulls from the same vendor-neutral, sourced definitions used throughout the MedTech Terms glossary. You see the one-line summary, the formal definition, why it matters in practice, common pitfalls, and the primary sources (FDA guidance, EU MDR/IVDR articles, ISO/IEC standards, MDCG documents, IMDRF principles) that back each entry. That makes the comparison defensible in regulatory strategy memos, design reviews, and submission narratives.

    Common comparison patterns

    How to use this tool

    Pick term A and term B from the dropdowns, or click a preset above. The URL updates with both slugs so you can bookmark or share the exact comparison with a colleague, a notified body reviewer, or your regulatory consultant. Click Open full page on either side for the complete entry, including FAQs, related terms, and the full citation list. If you are not sure which term to start with, browse the Categories view or the A-Z index.

    MedTech Terms is a vendor-neutral community resource sponsored by Blue Goat Cyber. Definitions are written for educational use and are not legal or regulatory advice.