Compare

    Two terms, side by side

    Pick any two terms to see definitions, context, pitfalls, and sources in parallel.

    Curated comparison tables

    In-depth, attribute-by-attribute tables for the most common MedTech term pairs. Each row is sourced from the linked term pages.

    Standards

    ISO 13485

    In one line
    International standard for medical device quality management systems.
    Definition
    ISO 13485:2016 specifies requirements for a quality management system where an organization needs to demonstrate its ability to provide medical devices and related services that consistently meet customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The standard is structured around QMS documentation, management responsibility, resource management, product realization (including design, purchasing and production) and measurement, analysis and improvement. Unlike ISO 9001, it emphasizes regulatory compliance and documented, risk-based processes over continual improvement. It is the basis for MDSAP audits, is a harmonised standard under the EU MDR and IVDR, and since February 2, 2026 has been incorporated by reference into FDA's QMSR.
    Why it matters
    ISO 13485 is referenced or required by regulators worldwide, including the EU (under MDR/IVDR) and Health Canada. FDA's Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), effective February 2, 2026, explicitly incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference, replacing the previous 21 CFR Part 820 Quality System Regulation. Certification is issued by accredited third-party registrars and is renewed on a three-year cycle with annual surveillance audits.
    Common pitfalls
    • •Treating ISO 13485 certification as proof of regulatory approval. Certification confirms QMS conformity; individual products still require the appropriate marketing authorization (510(k), PMA, CE mark, etc.).
    • •Copying an ISO 9001 QMS without adding medical-device-specific requirements (design controls, risk management, UDI, post-market surveillance, complaint handling).
    • •Weak supplier controls. ISO 13485 expects documented supplier evaluation, monitoring, and re-evaluation proportional to component risk.
    • •Under-scoping the QMS. Software design, cybersecurity, and contract-manufacturer activities all fall within scope when they affect the finished device.
    Open full page
    Select term B to compare.

    Why compare MedTech terms side by side?

    MedTech terminology is full of pairs that look interchangeable but carry very different regulatory, clinical, and commercial consequences. Picking the wrong framework, pathway, or standard early in a project can add months to a submission, invalidate clinical evidence, or trigger an audit finding. Side-by-side comparison is the fastest way to surface those differences before they become costly mistakes.

    Each comparison on this page pulls from the same vendor-neutral, sourced definitions used throughout the MedTech Terms glossary. You see the one-line summary, the formal definition, why it matters in practice, common pitfalls, and the primary sources (FDA guidance, EU MDR/IVDR articles, ISO/IEC standards, MDCG documents, IMDRF principles) that back each entry. That makes the comparison defensible in regulatory strategy memos, design reviews, and submission narratives.

    Common comparison patterns

    How to use this tool

    Pick term A and term B from the dropdowns, or click a preset above. The URL updates with both slugs so you can bookmark or share the exact comparison with a colleague, a notified body reviewer, or your regulatory consultant. Click Open full page on either side for the complete entry, including FAQs, related terms, and the full citation list. If you are not sure which term to start with, browse the Categories view or the A-Z index.

    MedTech Terms is a vendor-neutral community resource sponsored by Blue Goat Cyber. Definitions are written for educational use and are not legal or regulatory advice.