Compare

    Two terms, side by side

    Pick any two terms to see definitions, context, pitfalls, and sources in parallel.

    Curated comparison tables

    In-depth, attribute-by-attribute tables for the most common MedTech term pairs. Each row is sourced from the linked term pages.

    Regulatory

    De Novo Classification Request(De Novo)

    In one line
    Pathway to classify novel low- to moderate-risk devices that lack a predicate.
    Definition
    The De Novo classification process provides a marketing pathway to classify novel medical devices for which general controls alone, or general and special controls, provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for the intended use, but for which there is no legally marketed predicate device. A granted De Novo creates a new classification regulation and product code, so the device can then serve as a predicate for future 510(k) submissions. Requirements are set out in 21 CFR Part 860, Subpart D.
    Why it matters
    Granting a De Novo creates a new device classification (Class I or Class II with special controls) and can serve as a predicate for future 510(k) submissions, shaping the regulatory framework for an entire device category. It is intended for novel devices where risk is low to moderate but no legally marketed predicate exists.
    Common pitfalls
    • •Filing a De Novo when a plausible predicate exists. FDA may redirect the submission to a 510(k), losing months.
    • •Underestimating the special controls FDA may impose, which become binding on the applicant and future 510(k) followers.
    • •Skipping a Pre-Submission (Q-Sub) meeting to confirm De Novo is the correct pathway.
    Open full page
    Select term B to compare.

    Why compare MedTech terms side by side?

    MedTech terminology is full of pairs that look interchangeable but carry very different regulatory, clinical, and commercial consequences. Picking the wrong framework, pathway, or standard early in a project can add months to a submission, invalidate clinical evidence, or trigger an audit finding. Side-by-side comparison is the fastest way to surface those differences before they become costly mistakes.

    Each comparison on this page pulls from the same vendor-neutral, sourced definitions used throughout the MedTech Terms glossary. You see the one-line summary, the formal definition, why it matters in practice, common pitfalls, and the primary sources (FDA guidance, EU MDR/IVDR articles, ISO/IEC standards, MDCG documents, IMDRF principles) that back each entry. That makes the comparison defensible in regulatory strategy memos, design reviews, and submission narratives.

    Common comparison patterns

    How to use this tool

    Pick term A and term B from the dropdowns, or click a preset above. The URL updates with both slugs so you can bookmark or share the exact comparison with a colleague, a notified body reviewer, or your regulatory consultant. Click Open full page on either side for the complete entry, including FAQs, related terms, and the full citation list. If you are not sure which term to start with, browse the Categories view or the A-Z index.

    MedTech Terms is a vendor-neutral community resource sponsored by Blue Goat Cyber. Definitions are written for educational use and are not legal or regulatory advice.