Clinical Investigation Plan
EU MDR's term for the protocol document governing a clinical investigation of a device.
Definition
ISO 14155 and MDR Annex XV define the required content of the CIP - objectives, design, statistical considerations, ethical considerations, monitoring, and reporting. Functionally analogous to a U.S. clinical investigation protocol. The CIP covers the device description, endpoints, eligibility, sample size justification, follow-up schedule, adverse event handling, data management and the risk-benefit rationale. It must be approved by ethics committees and, where required, competent authorities before enrollment. Changes go through formal amendments, and the CIP forms the basis for monitoring, deviation assessment and the final clinical investigation report.What this means in practice
Sponsors running global trials typically maintain a single harmonized CIP/Protocol with regional appendices for FDA, MDR, and other regulators.Examples
- A MedTech company developing a novel vascular stent creates a CIP detailing the study population, inclusion/exclusion criteria, primary and secondary endpoints, and follow-up schedule for a pivotal clinical trial.
- Before initiating a usability study for a new insulin pump, a manufacturer develops a CIP outlining the user tasks, evaluation criteria, and methods for collecting user feedback.
- A sponsor conducting a post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study for a knee implant develops a CIP specifying the long-term patient monitoring, data collection points, and safety reporting requirements.
- •Failing to align the CIP with the Investigational Device Brochure (IDB) can lead to regulatory delays and ethical concerns.
- •Inadequate statistical planning in the CIP can result in a study that is underpowered or unable to demonstrate its primary endpoints effectively.
- •Not clearly defining stopping rules or adverse event reporting procedures within the CIP can jeopardize patient safety and regulatory compliance.
- •Overlooking the need for regional appendices in the CIP for multi-national trials can cause non-compliance with local regulations.
- •Submitting a CIP without a thorough risk management plan, as per ISO 14971, can lead to study approval issues.
Frequently asked questions
Related terms
Grouped by themeEditor's picks
· Hand-selected related conceptsMore in Clinical & Trials
· Same categoryTrial design that pre-specifies opportunities to modify aspects (sample size, arms, endpoints) based on interim data.
Any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, whether or not related to the device.
Data integrity principles: Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate (plus Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available).
An IVD's ability to detect small quantities of an analyte.
Where this term appears across MedTech Terms.
Sources
3 sourcesSources support the definition or relevant regulatory context, not necessarily every claim on this page. Each is graded against our source-tier hierarchy so you can see what rests on binding law versus commentary.
- 1ISO 14155Tier 1 VerifiedISOiso.org
- 2FDA - Clinical Trials and Human Subject ProtectionTier 2 VerifiedFDAfda.gov
- 3ClinicalTrials.govTier 3 VerifiedNIHclinicaltrials.gov
Inline markers like [1] jump to the matching reference above.